New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove in-tree openstack cloud provider #67782
Remove in-tree openstack cloud provider #67782
Conversation
Is Cinder CSI driver has all necessary pieces to do this? Will this stop in-tree Cinder volumes from working? |
okay, I see this is for 1.13.. I will stop panicking now. :D |
cc @cheftako |
will revisit this later. |
7ded937
to
4c33c7b
Compare
040635c
to
348b077
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e |
/assign @thockin |
@dims: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/skip |
This is terrifying. This ia massively breaking change, and I have not followed this process as closely as I would have liked, so I feel obligated to ask:
Can we update the PR comment to reflect this? |
@thockin LOL, there's like a half a dozen keps :) updated the PR comment. the final nail was kubernetes/enhancements#3462 migration notes were added in https://github.com/kubernetes/website/pull/32495/files |
@xing-yang @msau42 @jsafrane if you want to add more context. |
Mostly I just want to make sure that we set a precedent that this sort of nuclear bomb PR is self-contained enough for a poor user to find all the relevant info how to un-kill their cluster :) /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, thockin The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Also see blog that is being drafted for more context: kubernetes/website#36183 |
…OpenStackUnregister` feature gates These feature gates are removed with kubernetes/kubernetes#67782
…OpenStackUnregister` feature gates These feature gates are removed with kubernetes/kubernetes#67782
…OpenStackUnregister` feature gates These feature gates are removed with kubernetes/kubernetes#67782
* Add Kubernetes 1.26 support to README.md * Update cloud-controller-manager images * Adapt to the removal of the `CSIMigrationOpenStack` and `InTreePluginOpenStackUnregister` feature gates These feature gates are removed with kubernetes/kubernetes#67782
What this PR does / why we need it:
As part of the KEP process for Removing Cloud Providers from Kubernetes Core, We have moved the code over to https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack.
Please see the issue:
kubernetes/enhancements#1489
and the following KEPs for additional information:
There are still API data structures related to cinder volumes that will still remain here in the main k/k repository. The main thing being removed is the in-tree cloud provider and the in-tree support for cinder volumes. Please use the documentation and code from https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack.
The in-tree cloud provider was deprecated in #63524
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
/milestone v1.13
Release note: